NAAC
April 16, 2024 2024-05-11 12:42NAAC
CRITERION 1 - Curricular Aspects (150)
Key Indicator – 1.1 Curriculum Design and Development
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1.1 | Curricula developed and implemented have relevance to the local, regional, national, and global developmental needs, which is reflected in the Programme outcomes (POs), and Course Outcomes(COs) of the Programmes offered by the University | Know More |
| 1.1.2 | The Programmes offered by the institution focus on employability/ entrepreneurship/ skill development and their course syllabi are adequately revised to incorporate contemporary requirements | Know More |
Key Indicator- 1.2 Academic Flexibility
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1.2.1 | Percentage of new courses introduced out of the total number of courses across all programmes offered during the last five years | Know More |
Key Indicator - 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment (50)
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3.1. | Institution integrates cross-cutting issues relevant to Professional Ethics, Gender, Human Values, Environment & Sustainability and other value framework enshrined in Sustainable Development goals and National Education Policy – 2020 into the Curriculum | Know More |
| 1.3.2. | Number of certificate / value-added courses / Diploma Programmes offered by the institutions and online courses of MOOCs, SWAYAM / e_Pathshala/ NPTEL and other recognized platforms where the students of the institution have enrolled and successfully completed during the last five years | Know More |
| 1.3.3 | Percentage of Programmes that have components of field projects / research projects / internships during last five years | Know More |
Key Indicator - 1.3 Curriculum Enrichment (50)
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 1.4.1. | Structured feedback for curriculum and its transactions is regularly obtained from stakeholders like Students, Teachers, Employers, Alumni, Academic peers etc., and Feedback processes of the institution may be classified as follows: A. Feedback collected, analysed, action taken & communicated to relevant body and feedback hosted on the institutional website B. Feedback collected, analysed, action has been taken and communicated to the relevant body C. Feedback collected and analysed D. Feedback collected E. Feedback not collected | Know More |
CRITERION 2 - Teaching-Learning and Evaluation (200)
Key Indicator – 2.1 Student Enrolment and Profile
Key Indicator- 2.2 Catering to Student Diversity
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 2.2.1 | The institution assesses the learning levels of the students and organises special Programmes to cater to differential learning needs of the student | Know More |
| 2.2.2 | Student - Full time teacher ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) | Know More |
Key Indicator - 2.3 Teaching-Learning Process
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 2.3.1. | Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experience and teachers use ICT-enabled tools including online resources for effective teaching learning process | Know More |
| 2.3.2. | The institution adopts effective Mentor-Mentee Schemes to address academics and student-psychological issues | Know More |
Key Indicator - 2.4 Teacher Profile and Quality
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4.1. | Average percentage of full time teachers appointed against the number of sanctioned posts year wise during the last five years | Know More |
| 2.4.2. | Percentage of full time teachers with Ph.D./D.M/M.Ch./D.N.B/ Superspeciality/L.L.D/D.S.C/D.Litt. during the last five years | Know More |
| 2.4.3. | Average teaching experience of full time teachers (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year, in number of years) | Know More |
Key Indicator - 2.5 Evaluation Process and Reforms
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 2.5.1. | Average number of days from the date of last semester-end/ year- end examination till the last date of declaration of results year-wise during the last five years | Know More |
| 2.5.2. | Percentage of student complaints/grievances about evaluation against total number of students appeared in the examinations during the last five years | Know More |
| 2.5.3. | Status of automation of Examination division along with approved Examination Manual/ordinance A. 100% automation of entire division & implementation of Examination Management System (EMS) B. Only student registration, Hall ticket issue & Result Processing C. Only student registration and result processing D. Only result processing E. Only manual methodology | Know More |
Key Indicator - 2.6 Student Performance and Learning Outcomes
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 2.6.1. | The institution has stated learning outcomes (Program and Course outcomes)/graduate attributes which are integrated into the assessment process and widely publicized through the website and other documents and the attainment of the same are evaluated by the institution | Know More |
| 2.6.2. | Pass percentage of students (excluding backlog students) (Data to be provided only for the latest completed academic year) | Know More |
Key Indicator - 2.7 Student Satisfaction Survey
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 2.7.1. | Online Student Satisfaction Survey regarding the teaching-learning process. | Know More |
Criteria 3 - Research, Innovations and Extension (250)
Key Indicator – 3.1 Promotions of Research and Facilities
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 3.1.1 | The institution’s Research facilities are frequently updated and there are well defined policy for promotion of research which is uploaded on the institutional website and implemented | Know More |
| 3.1.2 | The institution provides seed money to its teachers for research (average per year) | Know More |
| 3.1.3 | Percentage of teachers receiving national/ international fellowship/financial support by various agencies for advanced studies/ research during the last five years | Know More |
| 3.1.4 | PERCENTAGE OF JRFS, SRFS AMONG THE ENROLLED PHD SCHOLARS IN THE INSTITUTION DURING THE LAST FIVE YEARS | Know More |
Key Indicator- 3.2 Resource Mobilization for Research
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 3.2.1 | Research funding received by the institution and its faculties through Government and non-government sources such as industry, corporate houses, international bodies for research project, Endowment Research Chairs during the last five years | Know More |
| 3.2.2 | Number of research projects per teacher funded by government, non-government , industry, corporate houses, international bodies during the last five years | Know More |
Key Indicator - 3.3 Innovation Ecosystem
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 3.3.1. | Institution has created an ecosystem for innovations, Indian Knowledge System (IKS) including awareness about IPR, establishment of IPR cell, Incubation centre and other initiatives for the creation and transfer of technology/knowledge and the outcomes of the same are evident | Know More |
| 3.3.2. | Number of awards received for research/innovations by the institution/teachers/research scholars/students during the last five years | Know More |
Key Indicator - 3.4 Research Publications and Awards
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 3.4.1 | The institution ensures implementation of its stated Code of Ethics for research | Know More |
| 3.4.2. | Number of Patents awarded during the last five years | Know More |
| 3.4.3. | Number of Ph.Ds awarded per recognized guide during the last five years | Know More |
| 3.4.4 | Number of research papers published per teacher in the Journals as notified on UGC CARE list during the last five years | Know More |
| 3.4.5. | Number of books and chapters in edited volumes published per teacher during the last five years | Know More |
| 3.4.6. | E-content is developed by teachers : 1. For e-PG-Pathshala 2. For CEC (Undergraduate) 3. For SWAYAM 4. For other MOOCs platforms 5. Any other Government Initiatives 6. For Institutional LMS | Know More |
| 3.4.7. | Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years based on average Citation Index in Scopus/ Web of Science | Know More |
| 3.4.8. | Bibliometrics of the publications during the last five years based on Scopus/ Web of Science – h-Index of the University h-index of the institution based on publications made in Scopus Web of Science during the last five years | Know More |
Key Indicator - 3.5 Consultancy
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 3.5.1. | Revenue generated from consultancy and corporate training during the last five years. | Know More |
Key Indicator - 3.6 Extension Activities
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 3.6.1. | Outcomes of extension activities in the neighborhood community in terms of impact and sensitizing the students to social issues and holistic development, and awards received if any during the last five years (Showcase at least four case studies to the peer team) | Know More |
| 3.6.2. | Number of extension and outreach programs conducted by the institution through organized forums like NSS/NCC with involvement of community year wise during the last five years | Know More |
Key Indicator - 3.7 Collaboration
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 3.7.1. | Number of functional MoUs /linkage with institutions/ industries in India and abroad for internship, on-the-job training, project work, student / faculty exchange and collaborative research during the last five years | Know More |
Criteria 4 - Infrastructure and Learning Resources (100)
Key Indicator – 4.1 Physical Facilities
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 4.1.1 | The institution has adequate infrastructure facilities for a. teaching - learning. viz., classrooms, laboratories, b. ICT enabled facilities such as smart classes, LMS etc. c. Facilities for cultural and sports activities , yoga centre, games (indoor and outdoor) gymnasium, auditorium etc. | Know More |
| 4.1.2 | Percentage of expenditure excluding salary, for infrastructure development and augmentation year wise during the last five years 4.1.2.1: Expenditure for infrastructure development and augmentation excluding salary, year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs) | Know More |
Key Indicator- 4.2 Library as a Learning Resource
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 4.2.1 | Library is automated with digital facilities using Integrated Library Management System (ILMS), adequate subscription to e-resources and journals are made. The library is optimally used by the faculty and students | Know More |
| 4.2.2 | Percentage expenditure for purchase of books/ e-books and subscription to journals/e-journals year wise during the last five years 4.2.2.1: Annual expenditure for purchase of books and journals year- wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs) | Know More |
Key Indicator - 4.3 IT Infrastructure
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 4.3.1 | Institution frequently updates its IT facilities and provides sufficient bandwidth for internet connection | Know More |
| 4.3.2 | Student - Computer ratio (Data for the latest completed academic year) | Know More |
| 4.3.3 | Institution has the following Facilities for e-content development and other resource development | Know More |
Key Indicator - 4.4 Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 4.4.1 | Percentage expenditure incurred on maintenance of physical facilities and academic support facilities excluding salary component during the last five years | Know More |
| 4.4.2 | There are established systems and procedures for maintaining and utilising physical, academic and support facilities - laboratory, library, sports complex, computers, classrooms etc. | Know More |
Criteria 5 - Student Support and Progression (100)
Key Indicator – 5.1 Student Support
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 5.1.1 | Percentage of students benefited by scholarships and freeships provided by the institution, Government and non-government bodies, industries, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years | Know More |
| 5.1.2 | Efforts taken by the institution to provide career counseling including e-counseling and guidance for competitive examinations during the last five years | Know More |
| 5.1.3 | Following Capacity development and skills enhancement initiatives are undertaken by the institution for: 1. Soft skills 2. Language and communication skills 3. Life skills (Yoga, physical fitness, health and hygiene, self-employment and entrepreneurial skills) 4. Awareness of trends in technology | Know More |
| 5.1.4 | The Institution adopts the following for redressal of student grievances including sexual harassment and ragging cases 1. Implementation of guidelines of statutory/regulatory bodies 2. Organisation-wide awareness and undertakings on policies with zero tolerance 3. Mechanisms for submission of online/offline students’ grievances 4. Timely redressal of the grievances through appropriate committees | Know More |
Key Indicator- 5.2 Student Progression
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 5.2.1 | Percentage of placement of outgoing students during the last five years | Know More |
| 5.2.2 | Percentage of graduated students who have progressed to higher education year-wise during last five years | Know More |
| 5.2.3 | Percentage of students qualifying in state/ national/ international level examinations out of the graduated students during the last five years | Know More |
Key Indicator - 5.3 Student Participation and Activities
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 5.3.1 | Number of awards/medals won by students for outstanding performance in sports/cultural activities at inter-university/state/national/international events (award for a team event should be counted as one) during the last five years | Know More |
| 5.3.2 | Presence of an active Student Council & representation of students on academic & administrative bodies/committees of the institution | Know More |
| 5.3.3 | The institution conducts /organizes following activities 1. Sports competitions/events 2.Cultural competitions/events 3. Technical fest/academic fests 4. Any other events through active clubs and forums | Know More |
Key Indicator - 5.4 Alumni Engagement
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 5.4.1 | Alumni contribution during the last five years to the University through registered Alumni Association | Know More |
| 5.4.2 | Alumni contributes and engages significantly to the development of University through academic and other support system | Know More |
Criteria 6 - Governance, Leadership and Management (100)
Key Indicator – 6.1 Institutional Vision and Leadership
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1.1 | The Institutional governance and leadership are in accordance with Vision and mission of the institution and it is visible in various institutional practices such as NEP implementation, sustained institutional growth, de-centralization, participation in the institutional governance and in their Short term and Long term institutional perspective plan. | Know More |
Key Indicator- 6.2 Strategy Development and Deployment
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 6.2.1 | The institutional perspective plan is effectively deployed and functioning of the Institutional bodies are effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative set-up, appointment, service rules, procedures etc. | Know More |
| 6.2.2 | Institution Implements e-governance in its operations | Know More |
Key Indicator - 6.3 Faculty Empowerment Strategies
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 6.3.1 | The institution has performance appraisal system, effective welfare measures for teaching and non-teaching staff and avenues for career development/progression | Know More |
| 6.3.2 | Percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years | Know More |
| 6.3.3 | Percentage of teachers undergoing online/ face-to-face Faculty Development Programmes (FDP)/ Management Development Programs (MDP) during the last five years | Know More |
Key Indicator - 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 6.4.1 | Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds other than salary and fees and the optimal utilisation of resources | Know More |
| 6.4.2 | Funds / Grants received from government bodies/non government and philanthropists during the last five years for development and maintenance of infrastructure (not covered under Criteria III and V ) | Know More |
| 6.4.3 | Institution regularly conducts internal and external financial audits | Know More |
Key Indicator - 6.4 Financial Management and Resource Mobilization
| Metric No. | Description | Documents |
|---|---|---|
| 6.5.1 | Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC)/ Internal Quality Assurance System (IQAS) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes, by constantly reviewing the teaching-learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes, at periodic intervals Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes visible in terms of – Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality (in case of first cycle) Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality and post accreditation quality initiatives (second and subsequent cycles) | Know More |
| 6.5.2 | Institution has adopted the following for Quality assurance: 1. Academic and Administrative Audit (AAA) and follow up action taken 2.Conferences, Seminars, Workshops on quality conducted 3. Collaborative quality initiatives with other institution(s) 4.Orientation programme on quality issues for teachers and students 5. Participation in NIRF and other recognized ranking like Shanghai Ranking, QS Ranking Times Ranking etc 6.Any other quality audit recognized by state, national or international agencies | Know More |
| 6.5.3 | Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality (in case of first cycle NAAC A/A) Post accreditation quality initiatives (second and subsequent cycles of NAAC A/A) | Know More |
Criteria 7 - Institutional Values and Best Practices (100)
Key Indicator – 7.1 Institutional Values and Social Responsibilities
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.1.1 | Institution has initiated Gender audit and measure for the promotion of gender equity | Know More |
| 7.1.2 | The Institution has facilities for alternate sources of energy and energy conservation measures | Know More |
| 7.1.3 | Describe the facilities in the Institution for the management of the following types of degradable and non-degradable waste | Know More |
| 7.1.4 | Water conservation facilities available in the Institution | Know More |
| 7.1.5 | Green campus initiatives | Know More |
| 7.1.6 | Quality audits on environment and energy are regularly undertaken by the institution | Know More |
| 7.1.7 | The Institution has Differently-abled (Divyangjan) friendly, barrier free environment | Know More |
| 7.1.8 | Describe the Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment i.e., tolerance and harmony towards cultural, regional, linguistic, communal, socio-economic and such other diversities | Know More |
| 7.1.9 | Sensitization of students and employees of the Institution to the constitutional obligations: values, rights, duties and responsibilities of citizens | Know More |
| 7.1.10 | The Institution has a prescribed code of conduct for students, teachers, administrators and other staff and conducts periodic programmes in this regard | Know More |
Key Indicator- 7.2 Best Practices
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2.1 | Describe two Best practices successfully implemented by the Institution | Know More |
Key Indicator - 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3.1 | Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust | Know More |
EXTENDED PROFILE
| Metric No. | Description |
|---|---|
| 1.1 | Number of students on rolls year-wise during the last five years |
| 1.2 | Number of final year outgoing students year wise during last five years |
| 2.1 | Number of Full-time teachers in the institution year-wise during last five year |
| 2.2 | Total Number of full time teachers worked/working in the institution (without repeat count) during the last five years: |
| 3.1 | Total Expenditure excluding salary year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs) |
EXTENDED PROFILE
| Metric No. | Description |
|---|---|
| 1.1 | Number of students on rolls year-wise during the last five years |
| 1.2 | Number of final year outgoing students year wise during last five years |
| 2.1 | Number of Full-time teachers in the institution year-wise during last five year |
| 2.2 | Total Number of full time teachers worked/working in the institution (without repeat count) during the last five years: |
| 3.1 | Total Expenditure excluding salary year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs) |
Key Indicator- 7.2 Best Practices
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2.1 | Describe two Best practices successfully implemented by the Institution | Know More |
Key Indicator - 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3.1 | Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust | Know More |
BEST PRACTICE 1
1.Title: Social Sensitization of Students and Society
2.Goal/Objective:
Contrary to popular belief, a student’s life involves more than just passing tests, getting a degree, and getting good grades. It’s not the same as before. Socially conscious students understand that contributing to their community is one of their main duties. In order for students to be effective both inside and outside of the classroom, it is crucial that colleges and universities instill in them a fundamental sense of social responsibility and raise awareness of social causes and concerns.
3.Context/ Purpose of Social Sensitization to Students and Society:
The purpose of social sensitization to students with the aim to develop positivity in environment and promotion of individual philanthropy when students learn that the institution where they study is interested in generous activities like chancellor scholarship for economically compromised students from villages of Aarang block. MATS University follows the motto of ‘giving back to the society’ which is clearly reflected in the way the university educates and teaches their students and society members of Aarang block.
The following are the main social initiatives and practices run by MATS University in nearby village of Aarang block including 5 adopted villages
- Evidence of Success: Different Practices of Social Sensitization to Students and Society:
Here are some glimpses of what is the aim of these social initiatives:
S.N. | Practices | Purpose |
1 | Koshish | MATS University started a social initiative in 2021 with the goal of assisting educators and school children via the implementation of health awareness-based, inspiring, and educational programmes in nearby villages of Aarang block |
2 | Social Awareness | Number of Programs conducted to promote Fundamental Duties and Social Awareness among society members of Aarang block like: 1. Program (Nukkad Natak) organized 2. An awareness program was organized under a Mental Health campaign in Amethi village. 3. Sports activity (C.G Olympics)organized for village students. 4. MATS University opened a Psychotherapy Centre OPD in main campus Aarang. 5. Visit at Eklavya residential school Bhoring, to motivate and encourage students. 6. Organized open science exhibition. 7. Swatch Bharat Abhiyaan at gullu village. 8. Sickle Cell awareness program at Amethi village |
3 | Aakash | MATS University runs a program called “AAKASH” under which use of technology related to drones and fix wing aircraft for problem solution to society as viable solution to the problems were done. |
BEST PRACTICE 2
- Title of the Practice: Academic Preview and Academic Review
- Goals : The objectives are
Academic Preview-
- To assess the academic preparedness of faculty for effective curriculum delivery. (Plan)
- To verify and validate components of Academic Administration Plan (AAP), and ensure its completeness by a panel of experts. (Check)
Academic Review-
- To verify the Course Files compiled by faculty members for their respective courses. (Do & Check)
- To assess the proper implementation of AAP, to suggest remedial actions and corrective measures if any. (Check & Act)
Underlying principle of this practice:
Preparation is the key to success (Academic Preview); feedback is the key to continuous improvement (Academic Review).
- The Context:
- Academic planning and preparation is meticulously monitored (Academic Preview) and its efficiency is checked and quantified in a well-defined process (Academic Review).
- Academic Preview and Review are uniquely designed to meet the Institute’s requirements to ensure quality education.
- Development of systematic mechanism for compliance is achieved through the Preview/Review Processes.
- The Practice:
MoE, and UGC focus on quality education in higher educational institutes through faculty development and curriculum enrichment. MATS University also believes in this philosophy and has therefore initiated Academic Preview and Review Processes to help set benchmarks for quality education and to streamline academic activities.
MATS’s Preview and Review Processes are strategically designed in terms of planning, implementation and their continuous improvement. Academic Preview of every faculty member is conducted before a semester begins and Review at the end of the semester.
Academic Preview:
As “Well begun is half done”, MATS has introduced Academic Preview which contributes to meticulous planning and use of appropriate academic resources for effective course delivery. It is carried out in three stages:
Stage 1: Faculty prepares all documents as per check list provided by IQAC
Stage 2: Faculty then submits action plan for curriculum implementation and to address gap.
Stage 3: HOS verifies and validates the academic preparedness and prepares annual academic activity calender.
Academic Review:
Academic Review is an evaluation of the implementation of AAP. Faculty appears for the Review process with respective Course File that contains well-documented proofs of all predefined items along with duly filled in formats circulated by IQAC. It is carried out in
Stage 1: Faculty submits standardized self-evaluated Review form to HOS. HOS validate the information at the Department level and the same is forwarded to the IQAC
Stage 2: The IQAC Audit team verifies the contents in the Review Form, Course File, Lab Manuals based on guidelines.
Stage 3: Report is submitted to the IQAC and feedback is communicated to the faculty.
Uniqueness:
- Development of a comprehensive AAP.
- Systematic mechanism for pre-teaching (planning) and post-teaching (evaluation) compliance through the ever evolving SMARTER (S=Specific, M=Measurable, A=Attainable, R= Relevant,T=Time bound, E=Evaluated and R=Reviewed) Academic Preview/Review Processes.
- Evidence of success:
Academic Preview and Review are successful endeavours at MATS and lead to curriculum enrichment. Implementation of Preview and Review processes has brought in significant positive changes in performance in the following areas:
- Innovative teaching learning styles
- Development of E-learning resources
- Adherence to academic calendar and AAP
- Proper documentation retrieval.
- Problems Encountered and Resources Required:
- Designing and developing of Academic Preview and Review process –identifying parameters, assigning weightages and deciding the marking scheme.
- Preparation of Course File comprising predefined items and relevant evidences which requires meticulous documentation skills.
- Creating awareness of the significance of the Preview/Review Processes, and orienting faculty towards the same.
Preview and Review processes:
Increasing awareness among faculty regarding:
- Innovative teaching-learning methodologies such as crosswords/mobile based exams etc.
- Online courses (MOOCs)
- Mechanism for preparing e-books (digital content)
EXTENDED PROFILE
| Metric No. | Description |
|---|---|
| 1.1 | Number of students on rolls year-wise during the last five years |
| 1.2 | Number of final year outgoing students year wise during last five years |
| 2.1 | Number of Full-time teachers in the institution year-wise during last five year |
| 2.2 | Total Number of full time teachers worked/working in the institution (without repeat count) during the last five years: |
| 3.1 | Total Expenditure excluding salary year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs) |
Key Indicator- 7.2 Best Practices
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2.1 | Describe two Best practices successfully implemented by the Institution | Know More |
Key Indicator - 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3.1 | Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust | Know More |
EXTENDED PROFILE
| Metric No. | Description |
|---|---|
| 1.1 | Number of students on rolls year-wise during the last five years |
| 1.2 | Number of final year outgoing students year wise during last five years |
| 2.1 | Number of Full-time teachers in the institution year-wise during last five year |
| 2.2 | Total Number of full time teachers worked/working in the institution (without repeat count) during the last five years: |
| 3.1 | Total Expenditure excluding salary year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs) |
Key Indicator- 7.2 Best Practices
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2.1 | Describe two Best practices successfully implemented by the Institution | Know More |
Key Indicator - 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3.1 | Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust | Know More |
EXTENDED PROFILE
| Metric No. | Description |
|---|---|
| 1.1 | Number of students on rolls year-wise during the last five years |
| 1.2 | Number of final year outgoing students year wise during last five years |
| 2.1 | Number of Full-time teachers in the institution year-wise during last five year |
| 2.2 | Total Number of full time teachers worked/working in the institution (without repeat count) during the last five years: |
| 3.1 | Total Expenditure excluding salary year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs) |
Key Indicator- 7.2 Best Practices
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2.1 | Describe two Best practices successfully implemented by the Institution | Know More |
Key Indicator - 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3.1 | Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust | Know More |
EXTENDED PROFILE
| Metric No. | Description |
|---|---|
| 1.1 | Number of students on rolls year-wise during the last five years |
| 1.2 | Number of final year outgoing students year wise during last five years |
| 2.1 | Number of Full-time teachers in the institution year-wise during last five year |
| 2.2 | Total Number of full time teachers worked/working in the institution (without repeat count) during the last five years: |
| 3.1 | Total Expenditure excluding salary year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs) |
Key Indicator- 7.2 Best Practices
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2.1 | Describe two Best practices successfully implemented by the Institution | Know More |
Key Indicator - 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3.1 | Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust | Know More |
EXTENDED PROFILE
| Metric No. | Description |
|---|---|
| 1.1 | Number of students on rolls year-wise during the last five years |
| 1.2 | Number of final year outgoing students year wise during last five years |
| 2.1 | Number of Full-time teachers in the institution year-wise during last five year |
| 2.2 | Total Number of full time teachers worked/working in the institution (without repeat count) during the last five years: |
| 3.1 | Total Expenditure excluding salary year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs) |
Key Indicator- 7.2 Best Practices
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2.1 | Describe two Best practices successfully implemented by the Institution | Know More |
Key Indicator - 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3.1 | Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust | Know More |
EXTENDED PROFILE
| Metric No. | Description |
|---|---|
| 1.1 | Number of students on rolls year-wise during the last five years |
| 1.2 | Number of final year outgoing students year wise during last five years |
| 2.1 | Number of Full-time teachers in the institution year-wise during last five year |
| 2.2 | Total Number of full time teachers worked/working in the institution (without repeat count) during the last five years: |
| 3.1 | Total Expenditure excluding salary year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs) |
Key Indicator- 7.2 Best Practices
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2.1 | Describe two Best practices successfully implemented by the Institution | Know More |
Key Indicator - 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3.1 | Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust | Know More |
EXTENDED PROFILE
| Metric No. | Description |
|---|---|
| 1.1 | Number of students on rolls year-wise during the last five years |
| 1.2 | Number of final year outgoing students year wise during last five years |
| 2.1 | Number of Full-time teachers in the institution year-wise during last five year |
| 2.2 | Total Number of full time teachers worked/working in the institution (without repeat count) during the last five years: |
| 3.1 | Total Expenditure excluding salary year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs) |
Key Indicator- 7.2 Best Practices
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2.1 | Describe two Best practices successfully implemented by the Institution | Know More |
Key Indicator - 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3.1 | Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust | Know More |
EXTENDED PROFILE
| Metric No. | Description |
|---|---|
| 1.1 | Number of students on rolls year-wise during the last five years |
| 1.2 | Number of final year outgoing students year wise during last five years |
| 2.1 | Number of Full-time teachers in the institution year-wise during last five year |
| 2.2 | Total Number of full time teachers worked/working in the institution (without repeat count) during the last five years: |
| 3.1 | Total Expenditure excluding salary year wise during the last five years (INR in lakhs) |
Key Indicator- 7.2 Best Practices
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.2.1 | Describe two Best practices successfully implemented by the Institution | Know More |
Key Indicator - 7.3 Institutional Distinctiveness
| Metric No. | Description | Know More |
|---|---|---|
| 7.3.1 | Portray the performance of the Institution in one area distinctive to its priority and thrust | Know More |
